<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DAILY SERVING &#187; Sara VanDerBeek</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dailyserving.com/tag/sara-vanderbeek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dailyserving.com</link>
	<description>an international forum for contemporary art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 03:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.13</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Sara VanDerBeek: Ancient Objects, Still Lives at Altman Siegel Gallery</title>
		<link>https://www.dailyserving.com/2014/07/44898/</link>
		<comments>https://www.dailyserving.com/2014/07/44898/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2014 07:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Altman Siegel Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art Practical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danica Willard Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sara VanDerBeek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyserving.com/?p=44898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From our partners at Art Practical, today we bring you Danica Willard Sachs’ assessment of Sara VanDerBeek’s solo show Ancient Objects, Still Lives at Altman Siegel Gallery in San Francisco. Willard Sachs notes that the work “…suggest[s] that the past and present are not so easily partitioned when placed under VanDerBeek’s careful aesthetic watch.” This article was originally published on July 21, 2014. Sara VanDerBeek’s photographs in her latest exhibition Ancient Objects, Still[.....]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>From our partners at </em><a href="http://www.artpractical.com/">Art Practical</a><em>, today we bring you <a href="http://www.artpractical.com/archive/contributor/danica-willard-sachs/">Danica Willard Sachs’</a> assessment of <a href="http://www.metropicturesgallery.com/artists/sara-vanderbeek/">Sara VanDerBeek’</a>s solo show </em>Ancient Objects, Still Lives <em>at <a href="http://www.altmansiegel.com/main.php?menu=current&amp;page=pics">Altman Siegel Gallery</a> in San Francisco. <em>Willard Sachs</em></em><em> notes that the work <em>“</em>…suggest[s] that the past and present are not so easily partitioned when placed under VanDerBeek’s careful aesthetic watch.<em>”</em> This article was originally published on July 21, 2014.</em></p>
<div id="attachment_44899" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-medium wp-image-44899" src="/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Sara_VanDerBeek__Chorrera-600x782.jpg" alt="Sara VanDerBeek. Chorerra, 2014; Digital c-print, 24 x 18 1/4 in; Edition of 6 plus 2 AP. Image courtesy of the Artist and Altman Siegel, San Francisco." width="600" height="782" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Sara VanDerBeek. <em>Chorerra</em>, 2014; digital C print; 24 x 18 1/4 in.; edition of 6 plus 2 AP. Courtesy of the Artist and Altman Siegel, San Francisco.</p></div>
<p style="color: #343434;">Sara VanDerBeek’s photographs in her latest exhibition <em>Ancient Objects, Still Lives </em>counter any notion that the still life is a staid mode of image making. Rather, her dreamy rose and violet digital chromogenic prints and minimalist sculptures both compress and expand time, revealing formal lineages between ancient and modern forms.</p>
<p style="color: #343434;">Although many of VanDerBeek’s images focus on details of the Pre-Columbian artifacts she photographed during her participation in the 12th Cuenca Bienal in Ecuador, the exhibition is thematically anchored by the more abstract diptych <em>Incidence</em> (all work is from 2014). Hung on the gallery’s central wall, each of <em>Incidence</em>’s panels depicts a white triangular prism hovering in flat, periwinkle-hued space. In the image on the right the polyhedron appears stationary, one of its stark white faces parallel to the picture plane. The image on the left, however, is doubly exposed, showing the same angle as the right panel with the polyhedron also pivoted several degrees around its front vertex. With this simple juxtaposition of perspectives, VanDerBeek “animates” the image, fleshing out the volume of the form and revealing the still life as both a static moment and as an index of the time it took make the image.</p>
<p style="color: #343434;"><a href="http://www.artpractical.com/review/sara-vanderbeek-ancient-objects-still-lives/">Read the full article here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.dailyserving.com/2014/07/44898/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Year’s Day Swimmers</title>
		<link>https://www.dailyserving.com/2013/01/new-years-day-swimmers/</link>
		<comments>https://www.dailyserving.com/2013/01/new-years-day-swimmers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amelia Rina]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conceptual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Painting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sculpture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Altman Siegel Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily Wardill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laeh Glenn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanya Kantarovsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sara VanDerBeek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyserving.com/?p=33643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first time I saw New Year’s Day Swimmers, the current exhibition at Altman Siegel Gallery in San Francisco, I didn’t mean to. I intended to pop into the gallery to drop something off, but as soon as I crossed the threshold I was completely captivated by the works and forgot everything else I was supposed to accomplish by my visit. Floating through the gallery,[.....]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_33644" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-medium wp-image-33644" title="newyears2013show1" src="/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/newyears2013show1-600x399.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="399" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Installation view, New Year&#39;s Day Swimmers, Altman Siegal</p></div>
<p>The first time I saw <em>New Year’s Day Swimmers</em>, the current exhibition at <a href="http://www.altmansiegel.com/main.php?menu=&amp;page=" target="_blank">Altman Siegel Gallery</a> in San Francisco, I didn’t mean to. I intended to pop into the gallery to drop something off, but as soon as I crossed the threshold I was completely captivated by the works and forgot everything else I was supposed to accomplish by my visit. Floating through the gallery, I moved from one work to the next, my realization of the works’ interconnectedness building at every turn. The mixed-media pieces, sequenced both in groups by artist and woven in with others, turned me into a pinball bouncing back and forth from one to the other and back again.</p>
<div id="attachment_33645" style="width: 459px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-33645" title="newyears2013show6" src="/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/newyears2013show6.jpeg" alt="" width="449" height="800" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Sara VanDerBeek, Silver Sky (Transmission), 2012 Digital c-print 61 x 47 in.</p></div>
<p>The first thing that caught my eye was <a href="http://www.altmansiegel.com/main.php?menu=svanderbeek&amp;page=pics" target="_blank">Sara VanDerBeek</a>’s large-scale piece, <em>Silver Sky (Transmission)</em>. From afar it looks like a giant mirror, but upon closer inspection a layer of texture under the reflective surface becomes apparent. Quickly the challenge became trying to see what the texture is, but all attempts were futile. The closer you get, the less you can see of any whole image that may be there, and if you step more than a few inches away, you are confronted with your reflection. It is a frustratingly existential task, trying to look through one’s image in a mirror and see something past it. But relief came in the form of distraction, as I noticed the other works in the reflection. VanDerBeek’s two other pieces, <em>Moon (Day)</em> and <em>Four Directions, Sky (East)</em> create a quietly powerful and cyclical connection between each other. Each piece reflects the others in its surface while rejecting any sense of easy visibility; the moon disintegrates into its highlight, the eight-sided tower fluctuates between appearing reflective and transparent, and the mercuric plane constantly confronts viewers with their own presence in the gallery.</p>
<p><span id="more-33643"></span></p>
<div id="attachment_33652" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-medium wp-image-33652" title="newyears2013show22" src="/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/newyears2013show22-600x745.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="745" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Sanya Kantarovksy, Untitled, 2012 Watercolor, ink and bleach on linen 30 x 24 in. (76.2 x 60.96 cm)</p></div>
<p>In contrast to the mystic minimalism of VanDerBeek’s pieces, <a href="http://www.kantarovsky.com/" target="_blank">Sanya Kantarovsky</a>’s paintings contribute a whimsical narrative, with an edge of menace and ambiguity. It may be largely due to the way the figures are rendered, but I cannot help but think that the best way to describe the paintings to say they look like Dr. Seuss went to grad school. Think of the infinite possibilities in the good doctor’s stories, and combine that with the restraint and matured consideration one would hope to get from an MFA program and there you have Kantarovsky. The paintings are darker and more introspective than anything I ever read by Seuss, yet maintain the simplicity that can make children’s illustrations so effective.</p>
<div id="attachment_33647" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-medium wp-image-33647" title="newyears2013show12" src="/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/newyears2013show12-600x783.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="783" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Laeh Glenn, Untitled (Flowers), 2012 Oil on panel, wood 16 3/4 x 12 1/2 in. </p></div>
<p>The success of the exhibition is that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. That is not to say that the individual works are lacking, rather that the sequencing and curation effectively create a platform through which they can be appreciated alone and in the group. The relationships between the works continue to grow the longer you experience them, as all the artists address similar issues but in very different ways. The examination of flatness and depth in Kantarovsky’s can also be found in the numerous rendering techniques of Laeh Glenn’s paintings. A rejection of boundaries and the frame is apparent in both Glenn’s work and <a href="http://www.altmansiegel.com/main.php?menu=ewardill&amp;page=pics" target="_blank">Emily Wardill</a>’s multi-media installation, in which the treatment of line and movement form a surprising link with Kantarovsky’s paintings. All aspects of the show, both artworks and the lyrical title, saturate the gallery with a dream-like aura. Like being on the cusp of a new year, of the future, they imply the possibility of something new and magical, yet also dangerous and uncertain. The only thing you can do is dive in headfirst.</p>
<div id="attachment_33648" style="width: 575px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-33648" title="newyears2013show17" src="/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/newyears2013show17.jpeg" alt="" width="565" height="800" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Emily Wardill, All over the world tonight, 2011 Inkjet print on silk sheet 43 1/4 x 22 in. </p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.dailyserving.com/2013/01/new-years-day-swimmers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MOMA: New Photography 2009</title>
		<link>https://www.dailyserving.com/2009/11/moma-new-photography-2009/</link>
		<comments>https://www.dailyserving.com/2009/11/moma-new-photography-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rebekah Drysdale]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carter Mull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Gordon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leslie Hewitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sara VanDerBeek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sterling Ruby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walead Beshty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyserving.com/?p=1552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Museum of Modern Art in New York is currently presenting New Photography 2009, this year&#8217;s installment of a series that began in 1985 with the aim of exhibiting the most compelling recent work in the field of contemporary photography.  Organized by Eva Respini, Associate Curator in the Department of Photography at MoMA, the exhibition brings together six young artists, Walead Beshty, Daniel Gordon, Leslie[.....]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wallspacegallery.com/artists.html?id=2,6" target="_blank"></a></p>
<div id="attachment_1621" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-1621" title="Walead Beshty" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Beshty_3ColorCurl1.jpg" alt="Walead Beshty" width="600" height="309" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Walead Beshty</p></div>
<p>The <a href="http://www.moma.org/" target="_blank">Museum of Modern Art</a> in New York is currently presenting <em>New Photography 2009,</em> this year&#8217;s installment of a series that began in 1985 with the aim of exhibiting the most compelling recent work in the field of contemporary photography.  Organized by Eva Respini, Associate Curator in the Department of Photography at MoMA, the exhibition brings together six young artists, <a href="http://www.danielgordonstudio.com/" target="_blank">Walead Beshty</a>, <a href="http://www.danielgordonstudio.com/" target="_blank">Daniel Gordon</a>, <a href="http://www.lesliehewitt.info/" target="_blank">Leslie Hewitt</a>, <a href="http://www.marcfoxx.com/artist/view/1410" target="_blank">Carter Mull</a>, <a href="http://www.foxyproduction.com/artist/view/6" target="_blank">Sterling Ruby</a>, and <a href="http://www.damelioterras.com/artist.html?id=42" target="_blank">Sara VanDerBeek</a>, in a visually diverse body of work.  Most of these artists actively produce work in other media, such as drawing, video, and installation, and each one has an innovative and distinct method of constructing a photograph.  Collectively, these artists investigate the making of a photographic image in the twenty-first century, often utilizing processes of collecting, assembling, or manipulating other images or items.</p>
<p>With the advent of contemporary aesthetics and technologies, photography, long characterized by its ability to capture and represent reality, is again the subject of critical debate. The historical definition of the medium is challenged by the rise of digital capabilities and software programs, which allow photographers to combine their own images with others that are digitally uploaded or scanned.  The abundance of imagery now available at the click of a mouse has led artists towards a deeper analysis of the role of an image within society.  The six artists included in the exhibition create their pictures in a studio or darkroom, investigating the expanded vocabulary of digital processes and its technical and theoretical implications for photography.   The exhibition highlights an epochal moment of transformation for the medium, showcasing the work of artists who critically confront our media saturated world, and open a new era of possibility for photography.  Some works reference traditional techniques of the medium while others are constructed from online images; the works included range from abstract to representational.<span id="more-1552"></span></p>
<div id="attachment_1627" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-1627" title=" Leslie Hewitt" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Hewitt_RiffsonRealTime.jpg" alt=" Leslie Hewitt" width="600" height="758" /><p class="wp-caption-text"> Leslie Hewitt</p></div>
<p>The monumental polychromatic photographs of Walead Beshty (b. 1976) dispense with specific content and outlying subject matter entirely, instead reflecting the technical and historical means of image production.  At a time when chemical photography is slipping into obsolescence, Beshty works completely without the use of a camera in the secluded space of a darkroom, removed from the outside world.  His psychedelic photograms, such as<em> Three Color Curl</em> (2008), result from exposing the sensitive material surface of the photograph to a range of various light sources and chemical applications.  Portions of photographic paper are exposed multiple times to cyan, magenta, and yellow lights.  Since the exposure process must take place in total darkness, a set of closed operations are administered, but largely left to chance, in the creation of these spectral compositions.  The surfaces of the photograms are treated as objects in themselves, released from the role of description.  Beshty pares down the photographic machinery in the creation of self-reflexive works that record the event, or the surrounding conditions, of their own production.  Beshty began employing this evidentiary photographic process after a trip to Berlin in 2006, where he took several conventional documentary shots of the unoccupied Iraqi embassy.  Upon crossing the border on his return to the United States, Beshty’s undeveloped film was accidentally exposed during the security scanning process, producing warm vermillion washes over the otherwise static architectural compositions.  The element of chance and its creation of non-referential, but highly indexical, information characterizes all of the artist’s subsequent work. Each <em>Three Color Curl</em> is the outcome of the direct manipulation of photographic elements.</p>
<div id="attachment_1622" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-1622" title="Daniel Gordon" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Gordon_NudePortrait.jpg" alt="Daniel Gordon" width="600" height="474" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Daniel Gordon</p></div>
<p>For other artists in the exhibition, the photographic image is the end result of a creative endeavor that begins with sculpture or collage.  The photographs exhibited by Daniel Gordon (b. 1980) represent the final stage of a process that starts with the construction of life-size figurative sculptures made from cut paper and other images, often culled from the internet.  In an <a href="http://http://dailyserving.com/2009/04/daniel-gordon-2/" target="_blank">interview conducted by DailyServing</a> earlier this year, Gordon describes his pictures as “a collaboration between me and everybody on the internet.”  Using online search terms such as ‘skin’, the artist compiles image results to use in the fabrication of his three-dimensional temporary collages that are then photographed.  Produced entirely within his Dumbo, Brooklyn studio, the crude figurative sculptures (often female) depict bizarre and sometimes unsettling situations; detached objects and anatomical parts mingle and merge with one other to form grotesquely appealing images, such as <em>Red Headed Woman</em> (2008).  Gordon’s photosculptures exist somewhere between two and three dimensions, visually interrupted by his disjunctive cuts which recall the photomontages of the Dadaists.</p>
<div id="attachment_1624" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-1624" title="Sara VanDerBeek" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/NP54_VanDerbeek2of41.jpg" alt="Sara VanDerBeek" width="600" height="896" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Sara VanDerBeek</p></div>
<p>Sara VanDerBeek (b. 1976), daughter of experimental filmmaker and animator Stan VanDerBeek (1927-1984), takes a similar approach to image making, appropriating current and historical photographs from various sources, including newspapers and exhibition catalogues.  She then creates temporary structures that exist only to be photographed.  <em>A Composition for Detroit</em> (2009), a multipart photographic work consisting of four panels, reflects the country’s current economic situation by exploring the state of postindustrial cities.  Media photographs from the 1967 Detroit riots as well as a Depression-era photograph by Walker Evans are symbolic markers in this cultural commentary.  Leslie Hewitt (b. 1977) combines personal and historic narratives within her photographs, examining how nostalgia and cultural meaning can be held within an image.  Hewitt meticulously composes and then photographs still life arrangements of personal artifacts, such as family snapshots or the 30<sup>th</sup> anniversary issue of <em>Ebony</em>, placing them with historic relics from the civil rights era.  In two of the works exhibited, Hewitt turns the orientation of the photograph upside down, causing visual tension for the viewer.</p>
<div id="attachment_1625" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-1625" title="Carter Mull" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Mull_LATimesTuesAug5.jpg" alt="Carter Mull" width="600" height="800" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Carter Mull</p></div>
<p>Works exhibited by Carter Mull (b. 1977) include <em>Los Angeles Times Tuesday, August 5, 2008 </em>and<em> Los Angeles Times Monday, February 23, 2009</em>, for which the artist photographed the front cover of the <em>L.A. Times</em>, his local newspaper, and at least two pictures responding to that page, and manipulated them using both digital and analog techniques.  Mull draws attention to the parallel between the transformation of photography and print media in the digital age with his vibrant and often patterned prints.</p>
<p>Sterling Ruby’s (b. 1972) digitally constructed photographic collages on display at MoMA, <em>Artaud</em> (2007) and <em>Animal</em> (2009) are based on graffiti found in the Cinque Terre region of Italy and in Venice, respectively.  Ruby took pictures of existing graffiti and digitally manipulated these photographs by adding his own painterly touches with Photoshop, resulting in rich and complex layers of imagery.</p>
<p>The six artists included in <em>New Photography 2009</em> are expanding the medium by introducing new ways of working with an image, whether referencing traditional techniques or exploiting the proliferation of images in our media saturated world.  Beshty, Gordon, Hewitt, Mull, Ruby, and VanDerBeek are blurring the lines of photography with other disciplines as they participate in the lively debate on the nature of photography in the twenty-first century.</p>
<p><em>New Photography 2009</em> will remain on view in The Robert and Joyce Menschel Gallery on the third floor of MoMA until January 11, 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.dailyserving.com/2009/11/moma-new-photography-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
