<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DAILY SERVING &#187; Robert Zhao Renhui</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dailyserving.com/tag/robert-zhao-renhui/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dailyserving.com</link>
	<description>an international forum for contemporary art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 03:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.13</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Landscape: The Virtual, The Actual, The Possible? at Yerba Buena Center for the Arts</title>
		<link>https://www.dailyserving.com/2014/11/landscape-the-virtual-the-actual-the-possible-at-yerba-buena-center-for-the-arts/</link>
		<comments>https://www.dailyserving.com/2014/11/landscape-the-virtual-the-actual-the-possible-at-yerba-buena-center-for-the-arts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2014 08:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guangdong Times Museum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kadist Art Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liang Shuo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Zhao Renhui]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shotgun Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YBCA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyserving.com/?p=46050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shotgun Reviews are an open forum where we invite the international art community to contribute timely, short-format responses to an exhibition or event. If you are interested in submitting a Shotgun Review, please click this link for more information. In this Shotgun Review, Scott Norton reviews Landscape: The Virtual, The Actual, The Possible? at Yerba Buena Center for the Arts in San Francisco. For much of art history, seventeenth-century[.....]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Shotgun Reviews are an open forum where we invite the international art community to contribute timely, short-format responses to an exhibition or event. If you are interested in submitting a Shotgun Review, please click <a href="https://artpractical.wufoo.com/forms/shotgun-review-submission-form/">this link</a> for more information. In this Shotgun Review, Scott Norton reviews </em>Landscape: The Virtual, The Actual, The Possible?<em> at Yerba Buena Center for the Arts in San Francisco.</em></p>
<div id="attachment_46051" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="wp-image-46051 size-medium" src="/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Changi-Singapore-600x337.jpg" alt="Changi, Singapore" width="600" height="337" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Robert Zhao Renhui. Changi, Singapore, Possibly 1970s (from the series As We Walked on Water), 2010–2012; digital photograph. Courtesy of Robert Zhao Renhui and the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts.</p></div>
<p>For much of art history, seventeenth-century notions of a hierarchy of genres within painting classified landscapes as inferior to history paintings, which were often filled with religious iconography and scenes from mythology. Several centuries later, some contemporary audiences continue to perceive landscapes as prosaic, formulaic, or downright boring. The curators and featured artists of the exhibition <a href="http://www.ybca.org/landscape"><em>Landscape: The Virtual, The Actual, The Possible? </em></a>suggest that we as a civilization have moved beyond the bounds of this ancient genre, and quite possibly beyond the point of no return as a planet facing a global climate crisis.</p>
<p>The configuration of the gallery is unique. It opens and unfolds like a Chinese scholar’s garden. Liang Shuo’s <em>Fit #9 </em>(2010), a playful assemblage of found toys, tools, and tree branches, seems to crawl down the entrance wall like a garden vine. Like the curated space it inhabits, Liang’s piece is a collection of objects without any seemingly rational relationship existing in forced harmony, inorganic posing as organic. Through our rationalization of its existence, perhaps as commentary on the ubiquity of human-made ephemera now found in nature, <em>Fit #9</em> becomes a part of the created scenery. Next to the piece, a slender window gives the visitor only a peek of what’s to come ahead. The curved path of the gallery’s hall forms the side of a square encompassing a circle, which is coincidentally a Chinese visual metaphor for heaven and earth, and a motif often present in Chinese gardens.</p>
<p><span id="more-46050"></span></p>
<p>In the central rotunda, digital photographs by Robert Zhao Renhui depict desolate scenery, natural and invented, in which humanity is both participant and active creator. In <em>Changi, Singapore</em> (2010–2012), one is met with an image of three humans exploring a dune. Seemingly natural, the dunes are manmade, built up with sand imported from other Asian countries as part of Singapore’s land reclamation of the sea. Here, the pictured space vacillates from false to real, blurring the boundaries between what is perceived as wild and yet is actually tame, through a landscape made possible only by the destruction and relocation of another.</p>
<p>The exhibition, conceived by three distinct sociocultural and geographic landscapes—the Guangzhou-based Guangdong Times Museum, the San Francisco/Paris-based Kadist Art Foundation, and the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts (YBCA)—leaves one to ask, what constitutes a landscape? Is it a representation of a place or is it a space, like a garden, that we invent for our own comfort and enjoyment? Moreover, what might this mean for how we perceive and interact with nature? What might this mean for the fate of our planet?</p>
<p>Landscape: The Virtual, The Actual, The Possible? <em>is on view at Yerba Buena Center for the Arts in San Francisco through January 25, 2015.</em></p>
<p><em>Scott Norton holds a degree in History with a focus in Intellectual History and Art History of Europe and Asia. He currently works on projects concerning East Asian scholar traditions and the history of tea production in East Asia.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.dailyserving.com/2014/11/landscape-the-virtual-the-actual-the-possible-at-yerba-buena-center-for-the-arts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taxonomy for the Goldfish Queen: An Interview with the Institute of Critical Zoologists</title>
		<link>https://www.dailyserving.com/2014/01/taxonomy-for-the-goldfish-queen-an-interview-with-the-institute-of-critical-zoologists/</link>
		<comments>https://www.dailyserving.com/2014/01/taxonomy-for-the-goldfish-queen-an-interview-with-the-institute-of-critical-zoologists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad at Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caroline Picard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Zhao Renhui]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Institute of Critical Zoologists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyserving.com/?p=42199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today from our friends at Bad at Sports we bring you an interview by Caroline Picard with artist Robert Zhao Renhui. On the subject of nature and narrative, Renhui explains, &#8220;As a species, we have always defined and controlled the way nature existed with us, and this is nothing new&#8230; Man has always determined what nature should look and feel like.&#8221; This interview was originally published on December[.....]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Today from our friends at </em><a href="http://badatsports.com/">Bad at Sports</a><em> we bring you an interview by <a href="http://badatsports.com/aboutus/broadcast-staff/caroline-picard/">Caroline Picard</a><strong> </strong>with artist <a href="http://www.criticalzoologists.org/">Robert Zhao Renhui</a>. On the subject of nature and narrative, Renhui explains, &#8220;As a species, we have always defined and controlled the way nature existed with us, and this is nothing new&#8230; Man has always determined what nature should look and feel like.&#8221; This interview was originally published on December 27, 2013.</em></p>
<div id="attachment_42200" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-42200 " alt="Blind Long-tailed Owl, Desert Variant of Little Owl from the series, As Walked on Water, 2011 Installation of vinyl print, 280cm x 194cm (Exhibition view)" src="/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/01-1-600x399.jpg" width="600" height="399" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Robert Zhao Renhui/Institute of Critical Zoologists. <em>Blind Long-Tailed Owl, Desert Variant of Little Owl</em> from the series, <em>As Walked on Water</em>, 2011; installation of vinyl print; 280 cm x 194 cm.</p></div>
<p>Singapore-based artist Robert Zhao Renhui is the <a href="http://www.criticalzoologists.org/" target="_blank">Institute of Critical Zoologists</a>, an organization that, for any Doctor Who fans out there, would be the environmental analogue to the Torchwood Institute. The fictional Torchwood was founded to protect the Earth from supernatural and extraterrestrial threats; with that mandate in hand, its employees must remain open and unperturbed by myriad strange and uncanny possibilities within the universe. Shrouded in secrecy, however, its associates attempt to perpetuate the myth of everyday banality to keep their fellow human citizens free from fear. Although similarly invested in the strange zoological proclivities of our non-human fellows, the ICZ is not a secret society. It delves into the multifarious world around us to expose the strange assumptions  humanity takes for granted about its surrounding landscape. Working primarily as a photographer, Renhui blends fact and fiction to emphasize the idiosyncratic relations between animals, their habitats, and the humans that categorize them. While the result is ecologically minded,  the dominant effect is uncanny. The ICZ affectively unearths little-understood behavioral habits of animals and re-presents them within gallery settings as representational photography, encyclopedic texts, and multimedia installations. ICZ&#8217;s current exhibit, <em>The Last Thing You See</em>, is up at <a href="http://www.2902gallery.com/" target="_blank">2902 Gallery</a> in Singapore until January 5 and examines the act of sight. By demonstrating the shift in perception that would result from a sensitivity to ultraviolet light, ICZ reveals a world familiar to insects and totally divorced from human experience. ICZ is going to appear in an upcoming series of shows I’m curating at <a href="http://gallery400.uic.edu/events/opening-reception-ghost-nature" target="_blank">Gallery 400</a> and <a href="http://www.ensa-bourges.fr/index.php/en/galerie-la-box/programmation-2013-2014/curatorial-project-2013-14/2339-projections-animalieres-" target="_blank">La Box</a>.</p>
<div>
<div><strong>Caroline Picard: </strong>How did the Institute of Critical Zoologists (ICZ) come about, and what does “animal spectatorship” mean?</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div><strong>Robert Zhao Renhui: </strong>The ICZ came about mainly because of my interest with photography and animals. A long time ago, I was involved with animal-rights activism. At that point of time, I was curious with how photography was used in animal activism. I contributed a lot of photographs to talk about the plight of animals living in captivity in Asia. I got too emotional and personally involved at one point. On the other hand, I was also using photographs to create my own fictional narratives about humans and animals. In college, my tutor asked me to look at my photographic narratives with my concerns of animals rights together, instead of two separate projects. Slowly, the ICZ took shape. Animal spectatorship, in my work, is very much about the conditions of looking and understanding animals.</div>
<div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>CP: </strong>I feel like you’re interested in the way things are visible and invisible—for instance, how a human can all but disappear in a suit of leaves, or what a spider’s web looks like in ultraviolet light. Can you talk more about how this series of works came together?</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div><strong>RZR: </strong>My interests are very much shaped by my medium, photography. Photography has always been about a way of seeing. In this exhibition, I was interested in how not seeing is as important as seeing. For the longest time, nobody knew why certain spiders weave distinctive markings on their webs. It isn’t logical for spiders to make these markings because then they render an otherwise hard-to-see web visible. Scientists came up with a theory that the markings are made to warn larger animals to not walk into the spiderweb and destroy it. In other words, the insect trap had a defense mechanism. It was only recently that we realized that most insects see in the UV spectrum, a visual spectrum invisible to humans. Under UV light, the web mimics the shape of a flower. These markings are also visible on flowers in UV light. A spiderweb that wants to be a flower. I like that idea. A mimic and an invisible trap. Like a photograph.</div>
<div></div>
<div><a href="http://badatsports.com/2013/taxonomy-for-the-goldish-queen-an-interview-with-the-institute-of-critical-zoologists/">Read the full interview here.</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.dailyserving.com/2014/01/taxonomy-for-the-goldfish-queen-an-interview-with-the-institute-of-critical-zoologists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
