<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DAILY SERVING &#187; R. H. Quaytman</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dailyserving.com/tag/r-h-quaytman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dailyserving.com</link>
	<description>an international forum for contemporary art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 03:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.13</generator>
	<item>
		<title>New Work: R.H. Quaytman at SFMOMA</title>
		<link>https://www.dailyserving.com/2010/11/new-work-r-h-quaytman-at-sfmoma/</link>
		<comments>https://www.dailyserving.com/2010/11/new-work-r-h-quaytman-at-sfmoma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conceptual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KQED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R. H. Quaytman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SFMOMA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyserving.com/?p=11057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today’s article is from our friends at KQED arts in San Francisco, where Danielle Sommer discusses R. H. Quaytman&#8217;s new work at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. In the 1950s, San Francisco poet Jack Spicer wrote that he considered a collection of poems to be a community meant to &#8220;echo and re-echo against each other.&#8221; A quick look at R.H. Quaytman&#8217;s new installation,[.....]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s article is from our friends at <a href="http://www.kqed.org/arts/" target="_blank">KQED arts</a> in San Francisco, where <a href="http://www.kqed.org/arts/profile/index.jsp?essid=23567">Danielle Sommer</a> discusses R. H. Quaytman&#8217;s new work at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11060" title="Screen shot 2010-11-08 at 10.29.22 PM" src="/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Screen-shot-2010-11-08-at-10.29.22-PM2.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="598" /></p>
<p>In the 1950s, San Francisco poet <a href="http://www.poets.org/jspic/" target="_blank">Jack Spicer</a> wrote that he   considered a collection of poems to be a community meant to &#8220;echo and   re-echo against each other.&#8221; A quick look at R.H. Quaytman&#8217;s new   installation, <em>I Love &#8212; The Eyelid Clicks / I See / Cold Poetry, Chapter 18</em>,   created just for <a href="http://www.sfmoma.org/" target="_blank">SFMOMA</a>, assures us that the analogy holds for a   collection of paintings, too. Perhaps this is the reason that Quaytman   and curator Apsara diQuinzio settled on Spicer as a guidepost for the   exhibition.</p>
<p>Quaytman works primarily as a painter, but her  installations are  site-based and could in many ways be considered  sculpture. Images are  meant to &#8220;echo&#8221; &#8212; to complement and conflict  with each other, and with  the architecture of the room. The paintings  in Quaytman&#8217;s one room  show-within-a-show at the Whitney Biennial last  spring stunningly  incorporated one of the Whitney&#8217;s trapezoidal windows  as a visual motif,  making the actual window look like a trompe l&#8217;oeil  painting.</p>
<div></div>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11061" title="quaytman1" src="/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/quaytman1.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="482" /></p>
<p>With the SFMOMA show, Quaytman is again confined to a single room, a  constraint that works well for her. The colors are subdued: a pastel  pink just beyond cream and plenty of shades of gray. Using SFMOMA&#8217;s  photo archive, Quaytman silk-screens images onto beveled, wooden panels  of various sizes. The images are somehow relevant to Spicer&#8217;s work,  although I&#8217;m fuzzy on the details: a snake, a creased photograph of a  young man, a tripod, and a set of moons. Despite this specificity, the  show is not drastically different from other Quaytman shows; while she  works in &#8220;chapters&#8221; and uses specific people &#8212; like Spicer &#8212; as a way  to dive into her work, her formal and conceptual concerns remain  constant &#8212; and exquisite.</p>
<p>Techniques you&#8217;re more-or-less guaranteed to see from Quaytman  include parallel lines so closely placed that they shimmer and pain the  eyes, paint mixed with crushed glass, and every once and a while a flash  of bright, bold color like florescent yellow or magenta. Perspective  shifts and jarring juxtapositions between flat, geometric designs and  representational images with deep space are par for the course, and most  horizon lines lead you to a vanishing point that is off the canvas or  in between two works. Shapes repeat, including a realistic  representation of the edge of the wooden panels, an effect that serves  to remind us that the paintings are objects, not just images.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11062" title="quaytman2" src="/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/quaytman2.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="655" /></p>
<p>Stare at any one painting for too long and the danger is retinal  burn. The silhouette of a snake surrounded by a sea of sparkling  turquoise remains as I blink my way around the room. The clutter in my  retinal field builds, disperses, and builds again. Across the room is  another painting with the same snake, larger and not in silhouette. Its  pebbly skin is visible, and it becomes tangled with the afterimage of  its cousin. There are two paintings that contain actual poems by Spicer.  Each poem is placed central to its canvas, and yet each is downright  painful to look at. Quaytman&#8217;s closely-placed lines prevent the text  from dominating the image, although when you do manage to lock onto a  poem and read it, everything in the periphery melts away.</p>
<p>&#8220;The poem begins to mirror itself,&#8221; writes Spicer. Poems mirror  poems. Paintings mirror paintings. Images appear, accumulate and  disperse, only to reappear. Jack Spicer passed away in 1965, but the  rhythm and resonance of Quaytman&#8217;s installation is a reminder of more  than the man. It&#8217;s a reminder of the cycling complexity of time in all  its invisible and visible moments.</p>
<p><em>New Work: R.H. Quaytman </em>is on view at through January 16, 2011 at SFMOMA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.dailyserving.com/2010/11/new-work-r-h-quaytman-at-sfmoma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
