<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DAILY SERVING &#187; Photogram</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dailyserving.com/tag/photogram/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dailyserving.com</link>
	<description>an international forum for contemporary art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 03:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.13</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Patryk Stasieczek: Asking For It at FIELD Contemporary</title>
		<link>https://www.dailyserving.com/2015/04/patryk-stasieczek-asking-for-it-at-field-contemporary/</link>
		<comments>https://www.dailyserving.com/2015/04/patryk-stasieczek-asking-for-it-at-field-contemporary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 07:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shauna Jean Doherty]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIELD Contemporary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patryk Stasieczek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photogram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telemetrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyserving.com/?p=47776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patryk Stasieczek is a painterly photographer. He is part of a loosely united cadre of artists whose work has been identified as “immaterial”—they’ve abandoned the apparatus of the camera almost entirely, but still use alternative darkroom processes and light-sensitive paper. Stasieczek’s abstract, kaleidoscopic works draw on the experimental legacies of analog photography, but are no less rooted in the digital realm. Accordingly, these are the[.....]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stasieczek.net/">Patryk Stasieczek</a> is a painterly photographer. He is part of a loosely united cadre of artists whose work has been identified as “immaterial”—they’ve abandoned the apparatus of the camera almost entirely, but still use alternative darkroom processes and light-sensitive paper. Stasieczek’s abstract, kaleidoscopic works draw on the experimental legacies of analog photography, but are no less rooted in the digital realm. Accordingly, these are the key elements that emerge in <em>Asking For It,</em> the artist’s latest solo exhibition at <a href="http://www.field-contemporary.com/">FIELD Contemporary</a>.</p>
<div id="attachment_47783" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-47783" src="/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/stasieczek_gesturedinterference13-fieldcontemporary-2015-web2.jpg" alt="Patryk Stasieczek. Gestured Interference (13), 2015; UV laminated digital light-jet print on metallic chromogenic paper, mounted on foam; 16 x 20 in. " width="600" height="750" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Patryk Stasieczek. <em>Gestured Interference (13)</em>, 2015; UV laminated digital light-jet print on metallic chromogenic paper, mounted on foam; 16 x 20 in.</p></div>
<p>Psychedelic and transcendent, <em>Asking For It</em> transgresses the traditional boundaries of the photographic medium by rejecting the representational in favor of total abstraction. As a record of their own production, these works emphasize the materiality of analog processes while denying the figurative intentions typical of photography. Conceived by the artist as interventions within stages of image production, they are innovative in a way that resists the banal simplicity of the digital.</p>
<p>In the <em>Gestured Interference </em>(2015) series, which includes multiple iterations, Stasieczek has taken a cellphone camera and smashed it with varying amounts of force against a number of telematic devices (technologies that transmit computerized information across long distances). This physical collision of technologies causes interference in the transmission and reception of a light frequency via the camera’s sensor. <em>Gestured Interference (11), </em>for instance, was achieved by striking a camera phone against a tube monitor while simultaneously taking images of the resulting effects.[1] Like the other works in the exhibition, the colorful lines of <em>Gestured Interference (11) </em>document the moment of the image’s making. The essence behind the image is the physical action, and it points to nothing outside of the technologies that were used for its production.</p>
<p><span id="more-47776"></span></p>
<div id="attachment_47782" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-47782" src="/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/stasieczek_gesturedinterference01-fieldcontemporary-2015-web.jpg" alt="Patryk Stasieczek. Gestured Interference (01), 2015; UV laminated digital light-jet print on metallic chromogenic paper, mounted on foam; 16 x 20 in. " width="600" height="750" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Patryk Stasieczek. <em>Gestured Interference (01)</em>, 2015; UV laminated digital light-jet print on metallic chromogenic paper, mounted on foam; 16 x 20 in.</p></div>
<p><em>Moiré (Light Painting Study) </em>(2013) is as technically complex as it is visually stimulating. A moiré pattern is a visual motif achieved by overlaying two identical series of straight lines or dots slightly askew from one another to produce a wavy pattern. Moiré also refers to the manifestation of unintentional visual artifacts in digital photography as an effect of the medium’s technological composition. Moiré patterns can be detected on television screens when a person wears patterned clothing—the interlaced scanning in televisions and digital cameras cause this moiré pattern to appear. The pattern is also evident when a television screen is photographed with a digital camera due to the scanning technique used by both devices to produce and capture images; the conflicting sets of lines cause a moiré to appear. Stasieczek has captured this effect by projecting a patterned image through an enlarger twice, and shifting one image slightly.</p>
<p>The artist further explores the potentials of optical techniques in <em>Untitled (Scale)</em> (2015), a photogram in which shapes and images are produced directly on light-sensitive paper. The photogram is a technique made famous by early-20th<span style="font-size: 10.8333330154419px;">-</span>century photographer Man Ray; it is achieved by placing objects on photo-sensitive material and exposing them to light.[2] Stasieczek dramatically enlarges his works, with the largest photogram extending to forty-eight by sixty inches. Like Man Ray, Stasieczek is an innovator who traverses the border of photography by wandering toward painting. The commingling of photographic technique with the sensibilities of painting results in a sophisticated collection of images that are both formally and technically intriguing.<em> </em></p>
<div id="attachment_47784" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-47784" src="/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/stasieczek_symphonyofgreys_fieldcontemporary_2015-web3.jpg" alt="Patryk Stasieczek. Symphony of Greys (King Photo/Custom Colour/The Lab), 2015; Photogram on digital light-jet chromogenic backlit paper on fluorescent lights, as found light box fixture; 48 x 72 x 9 in. " width="600" height="750" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Patryk Stasieczek. <em>Symphony of Greys (King Photo/Custom Colour/The Lab)</em>, 2015; photogram on digital light-jet chromogenic backlit paper on fluorescent lights, as found light box fixture; 48 x 72 x 9 in.</p></div>
<p><em>Symphony of Greys </em>(2015) makes use of a light box, again invoking the technology related to photography but avoiding the camera itself. Additionally, this light box has its own past; it belonged to various Vancouver-based photo studios (King Photo and Custom Colour) before ending up in Stasieczek’s hands. The artist plays with the essential elements of photography—the agency and operation of light—and modifies the fluorescent lighting tubes by wrapping them with color gels and changing the industrial object into a delicate, colored display. Stasieczek extends his fascination with the light box by modifying the gallery’s street sign (which reads “FIELD”) by wrapping the internal light tubes with theater gels.</p>
<div id="attachment_47785" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-47785" src="/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/stasieczek_askingforit_fieldcontemporary-installationview-04-web.jpg" alt="Asking For It, Patryk Stasieczek, Installation View at Field Contemporary, 2015. Left: Moiré, Pock, Wiggle (Light Painting Studies), UV laminated light paintings on chromogenic paper. Center: UV laminated digital light-jet print and photogram on metallic chromogenic paper, mounted on dibond. Right: Gestured Interference (07, 10, 01, 13, 08), UV laminated digital light-jet print on metallic chromogenic paper, mounted on foam." width="600" height="401" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Asking For It, Patryk Stasieczek, Installation View at FIELD Contemporary, 2015. Left: Moiré, Pock, Wiggle (Light Painting Studies), UV laminated light paintings on chromogenic paper. Center: UV laminated digital light-jet print and photogram on metallic chromogenic paper, mounted on dibond. Right: Gestured Interference (07, 10, 01, 13, 08), UV laminated digital light-jet print on metallic chromogenic paper, mounted on foam.</p></div>
<p>Stasieczek’s experiments necessitate a relinquishing of power. Chance operates in the works’ production, whether through violent acts in the <em>Gesture Interference</em> series or through chemical and light interferences that occur in his photograms. The unpredictability of the darkroom contributes to the dynamism of this collection. The artist creates the conditions under which his images emerge, developing a creative authorship that rests somewhere outside his complete control.</p>
<p>Patryk Stasieczek: Asking For It <em>is on view at FIELD Contemporary in Vancouver through April 25<span style="font-size: 10.8333330154419px;">, </span>2015.</em></p>
<p>[1] Patryk Stasieczek, email message to author, April 2, 2015.</p>
<p>[2] Robert Hirsch, <em>Seizing the Light: A History of Photography</em> (Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2000).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.dailyserving.com/2015/04/patryk-stasieczek-asking-for-it-at-field-contemporary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ewa Stackelberg: Fotogram at Fotografiska</title>
		<link>https://www.dailyserving.com/2015/04/ewa-stackelberg-fotogram-at-fotografiska/</link>
		<comments>https://www.dailyserving.com/2015/04/ewa-stackelberg-fotogram-at-fotografiska/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 07:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marilyn Goh]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artist Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ewa Stackelberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotografiska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Installation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photogram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stockholm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyserving.com/?p=47547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In October 1997, Ewa Stackelberg’s husband died in a plane accident in Costa Rica. Among the belongings sent to her after the tragedy was her husband’s camera, which had been smashed to pieces in the crash—almost like a foreshadowing of the turn that Stackelberg’s life and practice would take in the years to come. In the search for a new artistic language to express her grief,[.....]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In October 1997, <a href="http://www.ewastackelberg.se/">Ewa Stackelberg’s</a> husband died in a plane accident in Costa Rica. Among the belongings sent to her after the tragedy was her husband’s camera, which had been smashed to pieces in the crash—almost like a foreshadowing of the turn that Stackelberg’s life and practice would take in the years to come. In the search for a new artistic language to express her grief, photography—or rather, the production of photograms—eventually became Stackelberg’s chosen medium. Nearly two decades later, the tragedy continues to inform her oeuvre, in which metaphors of life and death, in their gloriously distilled forms, have found permanent imprints on light-sensitive paper. It is this aesthetic sensibility that underpins <a href="http://fotografiska.eu/en/utstallningar/utstallning/fotogram/"><em>Fotogram</em></a> (2015), a retrospective of Stackelberg’s work—taken over a period of fifteen years—at <a href="http://fotografiska.eu/">Fotografiska</a>.</p>
<div id="attachment_47548" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/divan-grottan.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-47548" src="/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/divan-grottan.jpg" alt="Ewa Stackelberg. Divan Grottan, 2011; photogram; Divan series. Courtesy of Ewa Stackelberg and Fotografiska. " width="500" height="669" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ewa Stackelberg. <em>Divan Grottan</em>, 2011; photogram; Divan series. Courtesy of Ewa Stackelberg and Fotografiska.</p></div>
<p>In technical terms, the photogram is a photographic image made without a camera, an old method that was, in the 19th century, employed by pioneers <a href="http://moholy-nagy.org/">László Moholy-Nagy</a> and <a href="http://www.getty.edu/art/collection/artists/1507/anna-atkins-british-1799-1871/">Anna Atkins</a> to create photographic illustrations with the <a href="http://www.alternativephotography.com/wp/processes/cyanotype/cyanotype-classic-process">cyanotype process</a>. To create a photogram, objects are placed between light-sensitive paper and a light source; when exposed, the areas of the paper that receive light appear dark, and the parts that do not receive any light appear lighter. The silhouette that gradually emerges is a negative shadow image that shows variations in tone, depending on the degree of opacity and transparency of the objects used. As with the photographic pioneers, Stackelberg’s process in the darkroom is one of conscious experimentation with the image-production process. A usable print or a favorable outcome is never assured—Stackelberg readily admits that there are more bad prints than good ones—but it is precisely this aesthetic uncertainty that’s so alluring, especially when the creation of a photogram is akin to engaging in &#8220;a dialogue between the unconscious and the artistic material&#8221; each time light, chemicals, and objects interact.</p>
<p><span id="more-47547"></span></p>
<div id="attachment_47552" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Turkos-med-prickar.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-47552" src="/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Turkos-med-prickar.jpg" alt="Ewa Stackelberg. Turkos med prickar, 2014; photogram; Summertime series. Courtesy of Ewa Stackelberg and Fotografiska. " width="500" height="628" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ewa Stackelberg. <em>Turkos Med Prickar</em>, 2014; photogram; Summertime series. Courtesy of Ewa Stackelberg and Fotografiska.</p></div>
<div id="attachment_47556" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fotogram-EwaStackelberg.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-47556" src="/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fotogram-EwaStackelberg.jpg" alt="Ewa Stackelberg. Hästen BFL, 2000; photogram; Tale for the Living series. Courtesy of Ewa Stackelberg and Fotografiska. " width="500" height="625" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ewa Stackelberg. <em>Hästen BFL</em>, 2000; photogram; Tale for the Living series. Courtesy of Ewa Stackelberg and Fotografiska.</p></div>
<p>In the dimness of Fotografiska’s gallery space, Stackelberg’s prints are startling, color-drenched images that bear little resemblance to the materials—thistles, moss, earth, offal, intestines, and tendons are her staples—that shaped them. In fact, there is a fearless, spontaneous element and an almost reckless abandon in the way her materials are gathered, displayed, and processed. <em>Torson</em> (2000) and <em>Liggande Kvinnan</em> (2005), for instance, belong to a playful group of photograms depicting Stackelberg’s silhouettes of herself—sometimes dressed only in ketchup—lying in various positions across the canvas. Many of her prints, such as <em>Turkos Med Prickar</em> (2014) and <em>Röd Rund Med Blad</em> (2014), capture the strange beauty of happenstance, like the emergence of life in a primordial soup where chaos is given free reign.</p>
<div id="attachment_47551" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/tarmar.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-47551" src="/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/tarmar.jpg" alt="Ewa Stackelberg. Tamar, 2000; photogram; Tale for the Living series. Courtesy of Ewa Stackelberg and Fotografiska. " width="500" height="626" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ewa Stackelberg. <em>Tamar</em>, 2000; photogram; Tale for the Living series. Courtesy of Ewa Stackelberg and Fotografiska.</p></div>
<div id="attachment_47550" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/liggande-kvinnan.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-47550" src="/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/liggande-kvinnan.jpg" alt="Ewa Stackelberg. Liggande Kvinnan, 2005; photogram, The Woman series. Courtesy of Ewa Stackelberg and Fotografiska. " width="500" height="253" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ewa Stackelberg. <em>Liggande Kvinnan</em>, 2005; photogram, The Woman series. Courtesy of Ewa Stackelberg and Fotografiska.</p></div>
<p>Most notably, Stackelberg’s prints are more aesthetically driven than functionalist entities; they aren’t immediate reflections of a cultural, social, or political ethos, but fixations on the incongruence between raw material and finished product. Even though each image is an exercise in capturing the amalgamation of “color, patterns, and stories,” the shockingly bright hues of the prints makes it easy to forget that the mesmerizing cobalt in <em>Hästen BFL</em> (2000) began with the violent action of ripping the eyes out of a dead horse’s head, or that <em>Tamar</em> (2000) started out as an exercise in arranging animal intestines. But because the finished product is visually satiating, achieved through staged compositions, and manifested with saturated colors, Stackelberg’s prints ultimately serve to remind us—obliquely—about the fallibility of vision, where beauty can still be gleaned from various states of putrefaction and decay.</p>
<p>Ewa Stackelberg: Fotogram<em> will be on view at Fotografiska in Stockholm through April 5, 2015.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.dailyserving.com/2015/04/ewa-stackelberg-fotogram-at-fotografiska/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
