<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DAILY SERVING &#187; Institute of Contemporary Arts Singapore</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dailyserving.com/tag/institute-of-contemporary-arts-singapore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dailyserving.com</link>
	<description>an international forum for contemporary art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 03:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.13</generator>
	<item>
		<title>We who saw signs</title>
		<link>https://www.dailyserving.com/2011/08/we-who-saw-signs/</link>
		<comments>https://www.dailyserving.com/2011/08/we-who-saw-signs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 07:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marilyn Goh]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conceptual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sculpture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video / Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adad Hannah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Allan Gilbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute of Contemporary Arts Singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ola Vasijeva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoca Muta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyserving.com/?p=18608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what sort of hybridised mise-en-scene can a human-puppet, man-made flowers (or they could just be gigantic paper-clips) and a bellman’s trolleys co-exist? Finding explanations of deliberate instability in Ola Vasijeva’s Alchimie Du Verbe (2009) compositional decisions are likely to be as vexing as sorting through a storehouse populated with random artefacts that come with no cataloguing labels. We who saw signs presents works that[.....]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_18610" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a rel="attachment wp-att-18610" href="/2011/08/we-who-saw-signs/2-7/"><img class="size-full wp-image-18610" title="Alchimie du Verbe" src="/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/2.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ola Vasiljeva, Alchimie du Verbe 2009, Analogue slides.</p></div>
<p>In what sort of hybridised mise-en-scene can a human-puppet, man-made flowers (or they could just be gigantic paper-clips) and a bellman’s trolleys co-exist? Finding explanations of deliberate instability in <a href="http://www.galerievangelder.com/artists/vasiljeva3.html" target="_blank">Ola Vasijeva’s</a> <em>Alchimie Du Verbe (</em>2009) compositional decisions are likely to be as vexing as sorting through a storehouse populated with random artefacts that come with no cataloguing labels.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lasalle.edu.sg/index.php/news-and-events/events/2011/779-we-who-saw-signs" target="_blank"><em>We who saw signs</em></a> presents works that are familiar bedfellows of semiotics, signification and pastiche, sutured together by their depiction of depicting predominantly intermedial states – a position “ascribed to objects, texts or persons caught some way in the vicinity of the threshold”<a href="#_ftn1">[1]</a>. While it pays concerted attention to the artist as visionary whose creative agency is directed towards uncovering the grey spaces between, the works convene comfortably within well-worn postmodernist underpinnings: the deconstruction of absolutes, eclecticism, the critique of myth of originality and the bias of accepted historical narrative. The viewer’s role is present but subtle; the transformation from artistic narrative into artistic prophecy is ultimately dependent upon our visual perception.</p>
<div id="attachment_18611" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a rel="attachment wp-att-18611" href="/2011/08/we-who-saw-signs/1-5/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-18611" title="Adad Hannah" src="/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/1-600x800.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="800" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Adad Hannah, Video stills from All Is Vanity (Mirrorless Version), 2009. HD video, 11 min 46s</p></div>
<p>Charles Allan Gilbert’s (1873-1929) <a href="http://www.posterunlimited.com/tel2414.html" target="_blank"><em>All Is Vanity</em></a> serves as a backdrop for <a href="www.adadhannah.com/" target="_blank">Adad Hannah&#8217;s</a> 11-minute video – identically titled as Gilbert’s drawing – whose subjects sit as still as possible with only their breathing and blinking movements as indicators of passing time. Hannah’s contemporary choreography of <em>memento mori</em> grafts the animate onto the inanimate within the time-based context of film, intruding upon the contemplative melancholy of mortality.</p>
<div id="attachment_18612" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a rel="attachment wp-att-18612" href="/2011/08/we-who-saw-signs/attachment/7/"><img class="size-full wp-image-18612" title="Yoca Muta" src="/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/7.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="450" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Yoca Muta, Video stills from Mountain, 2008, 5 min.</p></div>
<p>In <a href="http://www.yocamuta.com/main.swf" target="_blank">Yoca Muta’s</a> <em>Mountain</em> (2008), nature is a sheet onto which desires and longings are projected. A misty mountain landscape is revealed as a mound of (rather unappetising) cake that the artist consumes with relish. Perhaps a video-equivalent that hints at<em> trompe l&#8217;oeil</em> – the heightened form of illusionism to depict an object so exactly as to make it appear real – <em>Mountain</em> expounds on the playful nature of revelatory art and viewer perceptions.</p>
<p><em>We who saw signs</em> is on view at the <a href="http://www.lasalle.edu.sg/index.php/galleries" target="_blank">Institute of Contemporary Arts Singapore (ICAS)</a> until 4 September 2011.</p>
<hr size="1" /><a href="#_ftnref">[1]</a> Aguirre, Quance and Sutton: the definition of liminality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.dailyserving.com/2011/08/we-who-saw-signs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
