<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DAILY SERVING &#187; Heidi Rabben</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dailyserving.com/tag/heidi-rabben/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dailyserving.com</link>
	<description>an international forum for contemporary art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 03:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.13</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Summer Session – @Large: Ai Weiwei at Alcatraz</title>
		<link>https://www.dailyserving.com/2016/07/summer-session-large-ai-weiwei-at-alcatraz/</link>
		<comments>https://www.dailyserving.com/2016/07/summer-session-large-ai-weiwei-at-alcatraz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 07:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Installation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[@Large]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ai Wei Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcatraz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art Practical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heidi Rabben]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyserving.com/?p=52574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our current Summer Session topic is celebrity, and today from our sister publication Art Practical we bring you a review by Heidi Rabben of artist Ai Wei Wei’s controversial show @Large. Rabben takes Ai’s position as an artist–activist–provocateur to task, suggesting that the show relies too heavily on his reputation without delivering the content to match. This review was originally published on November 24, 2014. This text is likely neither the first[.....]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Our current Summer Session topic is celebrity, and today <em>from our sister publication</em> </em><a href="http://www.artpractical.com/" target="_blank">Art Practical</a><em> we bring you a review by Heidi Rabben of artist Ai Wei Wei’s controversial show</em> @Large<em>.</em><em> Rabben takes Ai’s position as an artist–activist<em>–</em>provocateur to task, suggesting that the show relies too heavily on his reputation without delivering the content to match. This review was originally published on November 24, 2014.</em></p>
<div id="attachment_52575" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Rabben_Ai_01.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-52575" src="/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Rabben_Ai_01-600x398.jpg" alt="Ai Wei Wei. With Wind, 2014; installation detail, New Industries Building, Alcatraz. Courtesy of FOR-SITE Foundation. Photo: Jan Stürmann." width="600" height="398" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ai Wei Wei. <em>With Wind</em>, 2014; installation detail, New Industries Building, Alcatraz. Courtesy of FOR-SITE Foundation. Photo: Jan Stürmann.</p></div>
<p>This text is likely neither the first nor the last thing you will read about <em>@Large: Ai Weiwei on Alcatraz</em>. Substantial coverage began far in advance of the insurgent artist’s opening in late September, and the hype has continued steadily since. So it is not without reservation that I contribute another drop in the bucket. But for a project that professes to be predicated entirely on freedom—of thought and of speech in particular—the vast majority of the <em>@Large</em> analysis is, at best, cautiously complimentary, and, at worst, reductive and descriptive. A number of factors may be contributing to this reserved reception, including the scale and budget of the project, the number of volunteers and assistants who assembled and help maintain it, the exhibition’s lengthy duration, and the nuance of its touristic setting. A section of the project website is even dedicated to these statistics, stressing the impressiveness of the undertaking. While surely significant, these elements overwhelmingly eclipse criticism about the artworks themselves. And beyond the stats looms an implicit hesitation about evaluating such socially conscious intentions, or perhaps further, of critiquing an artist–activist–celebrity like Ai Weiwei—a figure who, ironically, professes to invite and value serious critique. So in the spirit of one of the exhibition’s taglines, “Liberty is about our rights to question everything—Ai Weiwei” (which literally appears on the commemorative luggage tag), this review will question some of the core works and motivations in <em>@Large</em>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.artpractical.com/review/large-ai-weiwei-at-alcatraz/" target="_blank">Read the full review here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.dailyserving.com/2016/07/summer-session-large-ai-weiwei-at-alcatraz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Summer Session &#8211; Proximities 3: Import/Export at the Asian Art Museum</title>
		<link>https://www.dailyserving.com/2016/06/proximities-3-importexport-at-the-asian-art-museum/</link>
		<comments>https://www.dailyserving.com/2016/06/proximities-3-importexport-at-the-asian-art-museum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 07:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asian Art Museum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glen helfand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heidi Rabben]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imin Yeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyserving.com/?p=52226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From our sister publication Art Practical, today we bring you the next installment of our Summer Session—for June, we’re considering the idea of labor. Author Heidi Rabben assesses the exhibition Proximities 3: Import/Export at the Asian Art Museum in San Francisco and notes that it “provocatively address[es] the larger issue of material and immaterial labor across transactional flows.” This article was originally published on February 17, 2014. Proximities 3:[.....]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>From our sister publication </em><a href="http://artpractical.com/">Art Practical</a><em>, today we bring you the next installment of our Summer Session—for June, we’re considering the idea of labor. Author <a href="http://www.artpractical.com/archive/contributor/heidi_rabben/">Heidi Rabben</a> assesses the exhibition </em>Proximities 3: Import/Export<em> at the Asian Art Museum in San Francisco and notes that it “provocatively address[es] the larger issue of material and immaterial labor across transactional flows.” This article was originally published on <em class="date">February 17, 2014</em>.</em></p>
<div id="attachment_52227" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Imin_Yeh_Paper_Bag_Project_1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-52227" src="/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Imin_Yeh_Paper_Bag_Project_1-600x656.jpg" alt="Imin Yeh, Paper Bag Project, 2013; Handmade paper bag; 15 x 12 x 6 in. Courtesy of the Artist." width="600" height="656" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Imin Yeh. <em>Paper Bag Project</em>, 2013; handmade paper bag; 15 x 12 x 6 in. Courtesy of the Artist.</p></div>
<p><em>Proximities 3: Import/Export</em> is the third and final exhibition in a series at the <a href="http://www.asianart.org/">Asian Art Museum</a> exploring the Bay Area’s perception of, and relationship with, an increasingly globalized Asia. In this last installment, curator Glen Helfand [Full disclosure: Helfand has been an <em>Art Practical</em> contributor] has assembled a formidable group of artists whose work responds to issues around manufacturing, labor, trade, and commodification. The exhibition covers plenty of ground: Amanda Curreri’s works reference her time in South Korea, Byron Peters collaborates with a Shenzhen-based company to create his digital work, Imin Yeh borrows her creative process directly from India, and Rebeca Bollinger displays objects inspired by Japanese culture. Meanwhile, Leslie Shows’ and Jeffrey Augustine Songco’s contributions take a more macro approach to the region, thereby allowing the exhibition to simultaneously hone in on more narrow, context-specific scenarios while still addressing the wider implications of our relationship with Asia as a region. Of primary concern remains our growing reliance on outsourcing, industrial manufacturing, and the mobility of both material and immaterial labor.</p>
<p>On the material side, Imin Yeh’s work <em>Paper Bag Project</em> (2013) reveals the painstaking process of creating a consumer object with a very short lifespan: handmade paper shopping bags. Yeh singlehandedly replicates a production process she witnessed while visiting a factory in India, and documents every step on video, from hand pulping the paper, to screen printing designs, to weaving the rope handles.  The finished objects hang in the exhibition space in a grid against a white wall, their subtle pearlescent texture nearly blending into the background. With the addition of the accompanying video, we become acutely aware of how easily we could (and often do) miss the detailed amount of labor that goes into such disposable objects. Yeh’s piece underlines the wide disparity between labor and the attribution of value in trade and globalized societies.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.artpractical.com/review/proximities-3-import-export/">Read the full article here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.dailyserving.com/2016/06/proximities-3-importexport-at-the-asian-art-museum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ai Weiwei: @ Large at Alcatraz</title>
		<link>https://www.dailyserving.com/2014/11/large-ai-weiwei-at-alcatraz/</link>
		<comments>https://www.dailyserving.com/2014/11/large-ai-weiwei-at-alcatraz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 08:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Installation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ai Weiwei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcatraz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art Practical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOR-SITE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heidi Rabben]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyserving.com/?p=46208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today from our partners at Art Practical, we bring you Heidi Rabben’s assessment of @Large: Ai Weiwei on Alcatraz. Rabben writes, “&#8230;certainly, awareness and exposure counts for something, but whether or not these quantitative measurements will effectively impact or change any thinking about human rights is uncertain, and is therefore also a missed opportunity.” This article was originally published on November 24, 2014. This text is likely neither the first[.....]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Today from our partners at </em>Art Practical<em>, we bring you <a href="http://www.artpractical.com/archive/contributor/heidi_rabben">Heidi Rabben</a>’s assessment of </em>@Large: Ai Weiwei on Alcatraz. <em>Rabben writes, “&#8230;certainly, awareness and exposure counts for something, but whether or not these quantitative measurements will effectively impact or change any thinking about human rights is uncertain, and is therefore also a missed opportunity.” This article was originally published on <em class="date">November 24, 2014.</em></em></p>
<div id="attachment_46209" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-medium wp-image-46209" src="/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Rabben_Ai_01-600x398.jpg" alt="Ai Wei Wei. With Wind, 2014; installation detail, New Industries Building, Alcatraz. Courtesy of FOR-SITE Foundation. Photo: Jan Stürmann." width="600" height="398" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Ai Weiwei. <em>With Wind</em>, 2014; installation detail, New Industries Building, Alcatraz. Courtesy of FOR-SITE Foundation. Photo: Jan Stürmann.</p></div>
<p>This text is likely neither the first nor the last thing you will read about <em>@Large: Ai Weiwei on Alcatraz</em>. Substantial coverage began far in advance of the insurgent artist’s opening in late September, and the hype has continued steadily since.<span style="font-size: 11px;"> </span>So it is not without reservation that I contribute another drop in the bucket. But for a project that professes to be predicated entirely on freedom—of thought and of speech in particular—the vast majority of the <em>@Large</em> analysis is, at best, cautiously complimentary, and, at worst, reductive and descriptive. A number of factors may be contributing to this reserved reception, including the scale and budget of the project, the number of volunteers and assistants who assembled and help maintain it, the exhibition’s lengthy duration, and the nuance of its touristic setting. A section of the project website is even dedicated to these statistics, stressing the impressiveness of the undertaking. While surely significant, these elements overwhelmingly eclipse criticism about the artworks themselves. And beyond the stats looms an implicit hesitation about evaluating such socially conscious intentions, or perhaps further, of critiquing an artist–activist–celebrity like Ai Weiwei—a figure who, ironically, professes to invite and value serious critique. So in the spirit of one of the exhibition’s taglines, “Liberty is about our rights to question everything—Ai Weiwei” (which literally appears on the commemorative luggage tag), this review will question some of the core works and motivations in <em>@Large</em>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.artpractical.com/review/large-ai-weiwei-at-alcatraz/">Read the full article here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.dailyserving.com/2014/11/large-ai-weiwei-at-alcatraz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
