<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DAILY SERVING &#187; application</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dailyserving.com/tag/application/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dailyserving.com</link>
	<description>an international forum for contemporary art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 03:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.13</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Help Desk: Recommendations for References</title>
		<link>https://www.dailyserving.com/2017/04/help-desk-recommendations-for-references/</link>
		<comments>https://www.dailyserving.com/2017/04/help-desk-recommendations-for-references/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 07:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bean Gilsdorf]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etiquette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Help Desk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyserving.com/?p=55311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Help Desk is where I answer your queries about making, exhibiting, finding, marketing, buying, selling–or any other activity related to contemporary art. Submit your questions anonymously here. All submissions become the property of Daily Serving. I am often torn when applying for jobs, residencies, and grants when it comes to the references section. Is it better to list the names of people you do not know[.....]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Help Desk is where I answer your queries about making, exhibiting, finding, marketing, buying, selling–or any other activity related to contemporary art. Submit your questions anonymously <a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1DvE8IDJNCHQkAbiBeUoKSejRVz__Dygmrp7mhC9fJCY/viewform" target="_blank">here</a>. All submissions become the property of Daily Serving.</em></p>
<p><strong>I am often torn when applying for jobs, residencies, and grants when it comes to the references section. Is it better to list the names of people you do not know very well but carry more name recognition, or to list the names of lesser-known people you know well and would give you a very good reference? I often don’t ask people with “name recognition” (that I might know as acquaintances) because I worry they will think I am using them. How much weight does who you know carry in an application? What is the etiquette of asking people to serve as references?</strong></p>
<div id="attachment_55312" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://www.dailyserving.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Screen-Shot-2017-04-16-at-5.47.16-PM.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-55312" src="http://www.dailyserving.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Screen-Shot-2017-04-16-at-5.47.16-PM-600x399.png" alt="Gerda Scheepers. Taras Bookies, 2009; Installation View at Sprüth Magers Berlin." width="600" height="399" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Gerda Scheepers. <em>Taras Bookies</em>, 2009; mixed media; installation view at Sprüth Magers Berlin.</p></div>
<p>“It’s not <em>what</em> you know, it&#8217;s <em>who</em>,” the old adage goes. To be honest, I fall victim to this manner of thinking as often as anyone else, even when I’m the one being asked to supply the recommendation. A few months ago, when a colleague asked me to serve as a reference, my initial response was, “Wouldn’t you rather have someone with more clout?” I assumed that she must have far more important people in her corner, and that in the squishy place that we call the “art world”—where social capital outstrips nearly every other cultural marker of success—a tepid reference from a Big Name would count for more than an enthusiastic endorsement from little old me.</p>
<p>As it turns out, I was wrong. I did a lot of research to answer your question, and nearly everyone said  that they’d rather have a strong recommendation from an informed source. My colleague had been right to ask me rather than someone with more name recognition, because she and I went to school together and have conducted studio visits since then, so I’m very familiar with her process and her work ethic. Our long association means that I can speak directly to her growth as an artist, and I can attest to her commitment.</p>
<p>Don’t get tripped up, as I did, by thinking that name recognition is always going to be more meaningful than firsthand knowledge and genuine interest. <a href="http://www.artistcommunities.org/preparing-residency">The Alliance of Artists Communities</a> says, “While some major awards are interested in the who’s-who references, residency programs are interested in your seriousness as an artist, your dedication to a creative practice, and your ability to live in a close-knit community of others. If the program asks for letters of recommendation, ask your references to speak to these points, rather than simply what a wonderful artist [&#8230;] you are.” Simply put, your recommender should be able to discuss your work performance and speak cogently about your talents and abilities. It’s best if they have a clear understanding of your work and can tell the story of who you are as an artist. Someone who has spent time with you can also talk about your personality and character (your so-called <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_skills">soft skills</a>), which is often important for residency and job applications. Ask for references from the people who can provide an insider’s perspective.</p>
<p><span id="more-55311"></span></p>
<p>As far as etiquette goes, the normal rules of making a request apply: Try to ask early when possible, make it easy on your recommenders by suppling as much information as you can, and thank them profusely when they say yes. Be sure to tell your references what you are applying for, and why. Along with your request, you should send details about your application and your letter of intent or project proposal, even if it’s not finalized. In my experience, most recommenders will ask you to write a letter that they can edit and submit, but if the application doesn’t require a letter (some only require a phone number for a verbal reference), be prepared to provide your recommender with an outline of the specific experience and skills that qualify you for the residency, grant, or job. Under no circumstances should you exaggerate your accomplishments (and for Pete’s sake, never lie), but don’t be bashful, either—this is your time to shine. Application reviewers really want to be convinced, so false modesty generally isn’t a winning strategy. (If you are a woman drafting your own letter, or you are a recommender writing a letter for a woman, <a href="http://www.csw.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/csw_2015-10-20_lorbias_pdf_0.pdf" target="_blank">please read this</a> first). Is writing not your thing? That’s okay, there are tons of recommendation-letter examples online that will help you get started.</p>
<p>In looking for samples, I came across <a href="https://www.thoughtco.com/sample-recommendation-letter-for-a-college-applicant-466812" target="_blank">this piece of advice</a>: “A person who has worked closely with you or known you for a significant period of time will have more to say about you and will be able to offer specific examples to back up opinions. Someone who doesn’t know you very well, on the other hand, may struggle to come up with supporting details. The result might be a vague reference that doesn’t do anything to make you stand out as a candidate.” Reading this, I recalled how once, while attending a conference, I received a phone call from a granting institution asking me why I thought a colleague should receive a $25,000 award. (I knew this call was coming, but didn’t know exactly when.) I ducked into a hallway, and though I didn’t have my notes with me, I had known the artist in question for over a decade, so I was easily able to talk about her work ethic, her place in the regional community, and her continuing promise as an artist. As I described her personal and professional advancements, I started to get a bit worked up. I remember saying, “[This artist] is on track to become a respected public elder in the arts community. You should give her this award, she’s earned it.” The reviewer responded, “Thank you, that’s just what I needed to hear.” Would a big-name curator with a passing acquaintance to her work have been able to make the same passionate argument for her value? Probably not. She got the award—now go get yours. Good luck!</p>
<p><em>Help Desk is supported directly by our readers! Make it happen <a href="https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/dsap/support-daily-serving-and-art-practical" target="_blank">here</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.dailyserving.com/2017/04/help-desk-recommendations-for-references/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Help Desk: Residencies</title>
		<link>https://www.dailyserving.com/2012/11/help-desk-residencies/</link>
		<comments>https://www.dailyserving.com/2012/11/help-desk-residencies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 08:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bean Gilsdorf]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art/Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ellen Kooi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Help Desk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residencies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyserving.com/?p=32172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Help Desk is an arts-advice column that demystifies practices for artists, writers, curators, collectors, patrons, and the general public. Submit your questions anonymously here. All submissions become the property of Daily Serving. Help Desk is cosponsored by KQED.org. I want to start applying for artists&#8217; residencies and I don&#8217;t know where to begin. Is there a good place to find a listing of residencies, what are[.....]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Help Desk is an arts-advice column that demystifies practices for artists, writers, curators, collectors, patrons, and the general public. Submit your questions anonymously <a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1DvE8IDJNCHQkAbiBeUoKSejRVz__Dygmrp7mhC9fJCY/viewform">here</a>. All submissions become the property of</em> Daily Serving<em>. Help Desk is cosponsored by KQED.org.</em></p>
<p><em><a href="/2012/11/help-desk-residencies/help-desk-leader-24/" rel="attachment wp-att-32316"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-32316" src="/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Help-Desk-Leader3.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="107" /></a></em></p>
<p><strong>I want to start applying for artists&#8217; residencies and I don&#8217;t know where to begin. Is there a good place to find a listing of residencies, what are the best ones, and what advice could you give for putting together a stunning application?</strong></p>
<p>Residencies can be an artist’s joy: time and space (and sometimes technical facilities) to make your work, a community of dedicated peers, and stimulating conversation. But beware: they can also be financially- and emotionally-draining environments where a bunch of alcoholic drama queens keep you up all night, every night, for a month, so you need to do some very careful research before you pack your bags.</p>
<p>There are a number of online resources for finding residency programs, from collective listings to the programs’ own sites, so begin with some basic searches. I also suggest that you start semi-local: you might have a better chance of getting in, and you’ll be able to test the waters without having to sublet your apartment and move to another state or country for a few months. Try googling “[your state] artist residency” to see what comes up—my trial search for California returned a ton of opportunities. To find international residencies you can use the same google search with the name of the city or country you’d like to go to, or you can find sites like <a href="http://www.resartis.org/en/residencies/upcoming_deadlines/">ResArtis.org</a> and <a href="http://www.residencyunlimited.org/category/opportunites/ongoing/">Residency Unlimited</a> that list international residency programs and their deadlines.</p>
<div id="attachment_32317" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="/2012/11/help-desk-residencies/ellenkooi_1/" rel="attachment wp-att-32317"><img class="size-full wp-image-32317" src="/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/EllenKooi_1.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="263" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ellen Kooi, Nagele &#8211; wachthuis, 2011. Fuji Crystal Archive, Plexiglass, Reynobond, 31 ½ x 72 ½ inches</p></div>
<p>Which are the best residency programs? Well, that depends on what you’d like to accomplish. If you’re looking for some quiet time away from the pressures of everyday life, then you might prefer a cabin in the woods. If you’re desperate for interaction and dialogue, then you should look for something workshop-based or community oriented. If you’re hoping to crank out a large amount of work in a short amount of time, then you need to find a space that has the facilities you require to complete your project. I suggest you check out <a href="/2012/02/help-desk-school-daze/">this HELP DESK column on finding the right MFA program</a> (scroll down to the second Q&amp;A)—my advice for pinpointing “the best” applies to your question, too. In either case, the bottom line is that you need to be honest with yourself about what’s right for you at this stage of your practice. No single residency program can fulfill every desire, so narrow your list of goals down to one or two and then investigate residency opportunities to find the best match for what you hope to achieve.</p>
<p>Incidentally, a good match will also make a stronger application and you have a better chance of getting in if your goals fit closely with the program’s own mission. Conversely, if you’re a studio painter applying for a residency dedicated to experimental social interaction, you have what my friend Sylvan once dubbed “a rat’s-ass chance in a gator pit” of being accepted, so don’t waste time and energy—and maybe application fees—applying to residencies that don’t correspond to your aims.</p>
<div id="attachment_32318" style="width: 610px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="/2012/11/help-desk-residencies/ellenkooi_2/" rel="attachment wp-att-32318"><img class="size-full wp-image-32318" src="/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/EllenKooi_2.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="286" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ellen Kooi, Montallese &#8211; crossing, 2009. Fuji Crystal Archive, Plexiglass, Reynobond, 23 ½ x 50 inches</p></div>
<p>A great resource for information on applying to residency programs is Chapter 6 of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/ART-WORK-Everything-Pursue-Career/dp/1416572333"><em>Art/Work</em></a>. This section of the book discusses considerations for your own practice vis-à-vis different types of residency programs, and it reviews the basic parts of an application or proposal. It also has quite a few crucial pointers for completing a successful application, such as this one:</p>
<p>“Many programs will tell you what they focus on when evaluating applications. Of all the directions to follow, these are the most important. They’re not as easy to spot because they’re not necessarily written in the form of direct directions but rather as ‘criteria.’ You might see something like this: ‘Artists’ Fellowships are chosen based on the single criterion of work that demonstrates a compelling vision as defined by the assembled panel’s collective opinion.’ Note the words <em>single criterion</em>. They’re telling you up front that there’s only one thing that matters…[t]his program will make a qualitative assessment of your work, period. You therefore need to spend the most time on that part of the application and submit the best-quality images you can.”</p>
<p>Another source for information is <a href="http://www.transartists.org/deadlines">Trans Artists</a>, a self-described “knowledge centre on cultural mobility, with a strong focus on artist-in-residence opportunities.” Check out the <a href="http://www.transartists.org/artist-in-residence">Artist in Residence</a> page which describes types of programs and residency experience; and the <a href="http://www.transartists.org/checklist">Checklist</a> page, which has information that will help you with your research. Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.dailyserving.com/2012/11/help-desk-residencies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
