<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Terence Koh</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dailyserving.com/2007/02/terence-koh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dailyserving.com/2007/02/terence-koh/</link>
	<description>an international forum for contemporary art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2013 17:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.13</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>https://www.dailyserving.com/2007/02/terence-koh/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/?p=105#comment-27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[error in this posting / correction to be made:

Terrence Koh is not &quot;Chinese-American&quot;.  he is &quot;Chinese-Canadian&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>error in this posting / correction to be made:</p>
<p>Terrence Koh is not &#8220;Chinese-American&#8221;.  he is &#8220;Chinese-Canadian&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>https://www.dailyserving.com/2007/02/terence-koh/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 05:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/?p=105#comment-26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It took me a few days to really figure this one out. I had to keep coming back to it because I couldn&#039;t quite understand it, even after reading the post several times. Then, while in discussion about it, it dawned on me - the references to homosexuality, punk culture and the sheer phallic nature of the piece reminds me of some of MapplethorpeÔøΩs work. The differences in the two artist&#039;s work might be in the approach each artist has decided to deliver the information to the viewer. While Koh uses time-sensitive and delicate materials such as insect parts and presents his work with a more subtle visual, Mapplethorpe sort of puts it in your face with a raw visual. Although both artists can present in the viewer some uncomfortable feelings, Koh seems to bring the viewer a message that makes them think before they feel and Mapplethorpe seem to be looking to grab an emotional reaction out of the viewer before they have time to think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took me a few days to really figure this one out. I had to keep coming back to it because I couldn&#8217;t quite understand it, even after reading the post several times. Then, while in discussion about it, it dawned on me &#8211; the references to homosexuality, punk culture and the sheer phallic nature of the piece reminds me of some of MapplethorpeÔøΩs work. The differences in the two artist&#8217;s work might be in the approach each artist has decided to deliver the information to the viewer. While Koh uses time-sensitive and delicate materials such as insect parts and presents his work with a more subtle visual, Mapplethorpe sort of puts it in your face with a raw visual. Although both artists can present in the viewer some uncomfortable feelings, Koh seems to bring the viewer a message that makes them think before they feel and Mapplethorpe seem to be looking to grab an emotional reaction out of the viewer before they have time to think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
